<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1360 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374195</link>
    <description>The court quashed and set aside the notice of reopening of assessment for the Assessment Year 2010-11 issued to a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and processing frozen meat. The court found that the information from the Investigation Wing alone was insufficient to establish non-genuine expenditure by the company, and the Assessing Officer had not conducted follow-up inquiries or provided additional material to support the reopening. Given the detailed scrutiny during the original assessment where the payments to the supplier were accepted, the court deemed the reopening beyond the statutory period as unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:11:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1360 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374195</link>
      <description>The court quashed and set aside the notice of reopening of assessment for the Assessment Year 2010-11 issued to a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and processing frozen meat. The court found that the information from the Investigation Wing alone was insufficient to establish non-genuine expenditure by the company, and the Assessing Officer had not conducted follow-up inquiries or provided additional material to support the reopening. Given the detailed scrutiny during the original assessment where the payments to the supplier were accepted, the court deemed the reopening beyond the statutory period as unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>