<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1356 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the initiation of penalty proceedings by the Assessing Officer was deemed invalid due to the lack of a clear direction in the assessment order, as required by law. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Karnataka High Court, emphasizing the necessity of a discernible satisfaction of the AO regarding concealment in the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:02:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1356 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the initiation of penalty proceedings by the Assessing Officer was deemed invalid due to the lack of a clear direction in the assessment order, as required by law. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Karnataka High Court, emphasizing the necessity of a discernible satisfaction of the AO regarding concealment in the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>