<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1332 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374167</link>
    <description>The contribution collected by an insurer toward the Environmental Relief Fund under the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 was held not to attract disallowance under section 43B of the Income-tax Act because it was collected on behalf of the statutory fund, did not accrue as the insurer&#039;s income, and was not credited to the profit and loss account. The amount was shown as a current liability, and under the special insurance-company computation scheme only items debited to profit and loss can be added back. The absence of a prescribed remittance mechanism and period until later also supported the view that earlier non-payment could not be faulted. The addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1332 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374167</link>
      <description>The contribution collected by an insurer toward the Environmental Relief Fund under the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 was held not to attract disallowance under section 43B of the Income-tax Act because it was collected on behalf of the statutory fund, did not accrue as the insurer&#039;s income, and was not credited to the profit and loss account. The amount was shown as a current liability, and under the special insurance-company computation scheme only items debited to profit and loss can be added back. The absence of a prescribed remittance mechanism and period until later also supported the view that earlier non-payment could not be faulted. The addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>