<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules MFDs Not Prohibited Goods; Extended Producer Responsibility Applies Post-Utility Period; Bond Deposit Upheld.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44138</link>
    <description>Detention of imported item - prohibited goods or not? - The High Court rightly held that the MFDs having a utility period, the Extended Producer Responsibility would arise only after the utility period was over - there is no error in the penultimate direction to the respondents for deposit of bond without sureties for 90% of the enhanced valuation of the goods leaving it to the DGFT to decide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:47:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules MFDs Not Prohibited Goods; Extended Producer Responsibility Applies Post-Utility Period; Bond Deposit Upheld.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44138</link>
      <description>Detention of imported item - prohibited goods or not? - The High Court rightly held that the MFDs having a utility period, the Extended Producer Responsibility would arise only after the utility period was over - there is no error in the penultimate direction to the respondents for deposit of bond without sureties for 90% of the enhanced valuation of the goods leaving it to the DGFT to decide.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:47:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>