<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1321 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374156</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate goods imported against the Bill of Entry, impose fines, and penalties on the appellant for violating Customs Act and Foreign Trade Policy Regulations. The appeal challenging the confiscation and penalties was dismissed based on discrepancies between the declared and actual nature of the imported goods, despite the appellant&#039;s argument that the goods were Dual fuel Gensets capable of running on both petrol and LPG.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:47:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1321 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374156</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate goods imported against the Bill of Entry, impose fines, and penalties on the appellant for violating Customs Act and Foreign Trade Policy Regulations. The appeal challenging the confiscation and penalties was dismissed based on discrepancies between the declared and actual nature of the imported goods, despite the appellant&#039;s argument that the goods were Dual fuel Gensets capable of running on both petrol and LPG.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>