https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374144 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for differential service tax and penalties related to the calculation of service tax liability on food and service charges in an Outdoor Catering Service context. The Tribunal emphasized the need to differentiate between taxable and non-taxable components in service transactions, following the precedent that Outdoor Catering is a divisible contract of service. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the inclusion of commission, consultancy fees, and housekeeping charges in the taxable service category, granting the appellant full relief in the case. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374144 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for differential service tax and penalties related to the calculation of service tax liability on food and service charges in an Outdoor Catering Service context. The Tribunal emphasized the need to differentiate between taxable and non-taxable components in service transactions, following the precedent that Outdoor Catering is a divisible contract of service. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the inclusion of commission, consultancy fees, and housekeeping charges in the taxable service category, granting the appellant full relief in the case. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374144