https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374134 Where an appeal has already been admitted, a deposit directed only as a condition for stay of recovery cannot justify dismissal of the appeal for non-payment alone. The court treated the dismissal as unsustainable because the taxpayer offered a reduced cash deposit together with binding security over immovable property and an undertaking not to alienate it. Adequate alternative security was considered sufficient to protect the revenue, so the statutory appeal was restored subject to compliance with the modified deposit and security conditions. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:45:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374134 Where an appeal has already been admitted, a deposit directed only as a condition for stay of recovery cannot justify dismissal of the appeal for non-payment alone. The court treated the dismissal as unsustainable because the taxpayer offered a reduced cash deposit together with binding security over immovable property and an undertaking not to alienate it. Adequate alternative security was considered sufficient to protect the revenue, so the statutory appeal was restored subject to compliance with the modified deposit and security conditions. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374134