<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1295 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374130</link>
    <description>Land recorded as agricultural in sale deeds and revenue records, with no evidence of non-agricultural use or lawful permission for construction, fell within the exclusion from &quot;urban land&quot; under Explanation 1(b) to section 2(ea) of the Wealth-tax Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2013 with retrospective effect. The ITAT held that such land was not includible as an asset for wealth-tax purposes, so the wealth-tax addition on alleged urban land was unsustainable and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 07:45:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1295 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374130</link>
      <description>Land recorded as agricultural in sale deeds and revenue records, with no evidence of non-agricultural use or lawful permission for construction, fell within the exclusion from &quot;urban land&quot; under Explanation 1(b) to section 2(ea) of the Wealth-tax Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2013 with retrospective effect. The ITAT held that such land was not includible as an asset for wealth-tax purposes, so the wealth-tax addition on alleged urban land was unsustainable and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>