<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1761 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278339</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 5.27 crores for bogus share capital. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with the issue of Rs. 65 lakhs unexplained cash credit sent back for fresh examination, and the addition of Rs. 44.40 lakhs as commission deleted. The judgment underscores the importance of evidence and procedural compliance in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2019 09:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1761 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278339</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 5.27 crores for bogus share capital. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with the issue of Rs. 65 lakhs unexplained cash credit sent back for fresh examination, and the addition of Rs. 44.40 lakhs as commission deleted. The judgment underscores the importance of evidence and procedural compliance in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>