<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16502</link>
    <description>Interest on borrowings used for land from which agricultural income is derived falls within section 5(k) of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955 when the borrowed funds are actually spent on that land, and the deduction is confined to the statutory ceiling in that provision. The wider residuary deduction in section 5(e) does not permit a taxpayer to recharacterise interest already governed by section 5(k) or shift any disallowed portion to bypass the ceiling. Eligibility depends on the purpose of the borrowing and the actual use of the borrowed amount. Where the factual basis for those matters was not examined below, fresh scrutiny of the evidence is required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16502</link>
      <description>Interest on borrowings used for land from which agricultural income is derived falls within section 5(k) of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955 when the borrowed funds are actually spent on that land, and the deduction is confined to the statutory ceiling in that provision. The wider residuary deduction in section 5(e) does not permit a taxpayer to recharacterise interest already governed by section 5(k) or shift any disallowed portion to bypass the ceiling. Eligibility depends on the purpose of the borrowing and the actual use of the borrowed amount. Where the factual basis for those matters was not examined below, fresh scrutiny of the evidence is required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>