https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16495 The High Court held that the assessee-firm was not entitled to continuation of registration for the assessment years 1963-64, 1964-65, and 1965-66. Despite the Tribunal's decision in favor of the firm, the High Court found the absence of one partner's signature on the partnership deed and related documents rendered the registration invalid due to non-compliance with statutory requirements under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court rejected the Tribunal's reliance on certain precedents and ruled in favor of the Revenue, with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:54:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16495 The High Court held that the assessee-firm was not entitled to continuation of registration for the assessment years 1963-64, 1964-65, and 1965-66. Despite the Tribunal's decision in favor of the firm, the High Court found the absence of one partner's signature on the partnership deed and related documents rendered the registration invalid due to non-compliance with statutory requirements under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court rejected the Tribunal's reliance on certain precedents and ruled in favor of the Revenue, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 02 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16495