<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 35 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16493</link>
    <description>Provision made for employee bonus was held allowable as a deduction because the amount had not been paid by year-end, but clause (c) of section 43B of the Income-tax Act applied only from 1 April 1989 and was not applicable to the relevant assessment year. The amount was also found not to fall within the extended expression relating to an employee welfare fund, and section 43B(b) was held inapplicable on the facts. The assessee therefore succeeded on the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 35 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16493</link>
      <description>Provision made for employee bonus was held allowable as a deduction because the amount had not been paid by year-end, but clause (c) of section 43B of the Income-tax Act applied only from 1 April 1989 and was not applicable to the relevant assessment year. The amount was also found not to fall within the extended expression relating to an employee welfare fund, and section 43B(b) was held inapplicable on the facts. The assessee therefore succeeded on the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>