<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 74 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16492</link>
    <description>Retrospective amendments to the Income-tax Act brought cash compensatory support, duty drawback and profit on sale of import entitlements within business income, and profit on sale of imported material was also treated as a business receipt rather than a capital receipt. The statutory insertion of the relevant clauses in section 28 and section 2(24) deemed these export-linked receipts to be profits and gains of business, with retrospective effect from the specified dates. On that basis, the receipts were taxable as income and the contrary capital-receipt contention failed. The reference was answered against the assessee on the substantive taxability issues, while unanswered questions were left undecided because they were not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 74 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16492</link>
      <description>Retrospective amendments to the Income-tax Act brought cash compensatory support, duty drawback and profit on sale of import entitlements within business income, and profit on sale of imported material was also treated as a business receipt rather than a capital receipt. The statutory insertion of the relevant clauses in section 28 and section 2(24) deemed these export-linked receipts to be profits and gains of business, with retrospective effect from the specified dates. On that basis, the receipts were taxable as income and the contrary capital-receipt contention failed. The reference was answered against the assessee on the substantive taxability issues, while unanswered questions were left undecided because they were not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>