<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1288 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374123</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) for abetting the offense of exporting prohibited goods. The penalty imposed on the CHA was reduced from Rs. 30,00,000 to Rs. 15,00,000. The decision highlighted the significance of due diligence and compliance by CHAs to prevent involvement in illegal activities and emphasized the need for verifying the legitimacy of transactions and clients.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:28:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1288 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374123</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) for abetting the offense of exporting prohibited goods. The penalty imposed on the CHA was reduced from Rs. 30,00,000 to Rs. 15,00,000. The decision highlighted the significance of due diligence and compliance by CHAs to prevent involvement in illegal activities and emphasized the need for verifying the legitimacy of transactions and clients.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>