<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1279 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374114</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2011-12. The court found that the petitioner had made full disclosure during the regular assessment proceedings, and the notice was issued beyond the prescribed time limit without relying on fresh material, rendering it invalid under the law. The court concluded that there was no justification for reopening the assessment, leading to the writ petition being allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:15:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1279 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374114</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for Assessment Year 2011-12. The court found that the petitioner had made full disclosure during the regular assessment proceedings, and the notice was issued beyond the prescribed time limit without relying on fresh material, rendering it invalid under the law. The court concluded that there was no justification for reopening the assessment, leading to the writ petition being allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>