<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1237 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing their appeals against the rejection of refund claims for CENVAT credit on service tax paid on import of services under the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to avail the credit based on ST challans as per Rule 9(1)(e) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The impugned orders were set aside as unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:04:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1237 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, allowing their appeals against the rejection of refund claims for CENVAT credit on service tax paid on import of services under the Reverse Charge Mechanism. The Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to avail the credit based on ST challans as per Rule 9(1)(e) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The impugned orders were set aside as unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>