<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1232 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374067</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Vishal Traders by setting aside the penalty under section 78, considering the absence of evidence for invoking it. The judgment addressed the tax liability, penalties, nature of services, and the appropriation of excess tax in a detailed and comprehensive manner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:04:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1232 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374067</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Vishal Traders by setting aside the penalty under section 78, considering the absence of evidence for invoking it. The judgment addressed the tax liability, penalties, nature of services, and the appropriation of excess tax in a detailed and comprehensive manner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>