<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Insufficient Penalty Evidence for Service Tax Evasion Allegations; Department Must Prove Intent Under Sub-section (4.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44090</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - Mere non-payment or short payment for a particular period even till the time audit is not sufficient to prove the grave allegations as are contained in sub-section (4). It is rather the onus of Department to come forward to give some evidence of positive act on part of the appellant proving the appellants intend to evade the tax duty</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:51:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Insufficient Penalty Evidence for Service Tax Evasion Allegations; Department Must Prove Intent Under Sub-section (4.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44090</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - Mere non-payment or short payment for a particular period even till the time audit is not sufficient to prove the grave allegations as are contained in sub-section (4). It is rather the onus of Department to come forward to give some evidence of positive act on part of the appellant proving the appellants intend to evade the tax duty</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:51:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>