<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Dept&#039;s Claims Questioned: No Buyer Info or Independent Evidence on Alleged Clandestine Goods Removal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44087</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal - Revenue were not able to provide even the single buyer’s name and address who has purchased such goods from them which leads to doubt about the credibility of their statement. The department apart from the papers seized from the locker has not been able to give any independent evidence which can corroborate the charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:08:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Dept&#039;s Claims Questioned: No Buyer Info or Independent Evidence on Alleged Clandestine Goods Removal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44087</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal - Revenue were not able to provide even the single buyer’s name and address who has purchased such goods from them which leads to doubt about the credibility of their statement. The department apart from the papers seized from the locker has not been able to give any independent evidence which can corroborate the charges.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:08:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>