<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 73 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16470</link>
    <description>Retrospective insertion of section 28(iiia) and section 2(24)(va) brought profits on sale of import entitlements within business income for the relevant assessment year, so the amount was assessable as business income. Expenditure limited to transportation of goods within India up to the port did not fall within the scope of weighted deduction under section 35B, so the deduction was unavailable. Both questions were answered against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:51:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 73 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16470</link>
      <description>Retrospective insertion of section 28(iiia) and section 2(24)(va) brought profits on sale of import entitlements within business income for the relevant assessment year, so the amount was assessable as business income. Expenditure limited to transportation of goods within India up to the port did not fall within the scope of weighted deduction under section 35B, so the deduction was unavailable. Both questions were answered against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>