<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1212 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374047</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Tax Appeal. The court found that the Keyman Insurance Policy was correctly treated as such, and no legal issue arose. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 14A was deemed factual and not a legal matter. The court did not address the issue of disallowance of expenditure for earning tax-exempt income, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1212 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374047</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Tax Appeal. The court found that the Keyman Insurance Policy was correctly treated as such, and no legal issue arose. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 14A was deemed factual and not a legal matter. The court did not address the issue of disallowance of expenditure for earning tax-exempt income, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>