<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1201 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374036</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune allowed the appeal of the Credit Co-operative Society, granting the deduction under section 80P for interest income from investments in nationalized banks. The Tribunal relied on previous decisions in favor of the assessee and emphasized consistency in applying legal principles. The Tribunal did not provide specific details on the just and equitable relief claim or the deletion of interest under section 234B but focused on the deduction under section 80P based on established precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1201 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374036</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune allowed the appeal of the Credit Co-operative Society, granting the deduction under section 80P for interest income from investments in nationalized banks. The Tribunal relied on previous decisions in favor of the assessee and emphasized consistency in applying legal principles. The Tribunal did not provide specific details on the just and equitable relief claim or the deletion of interest under section 234B but focused on the deduction under section 80P based on established precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>