<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1200 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act for the relevant assessment year due to a defective show cause notice that lacked specificity on the limb of the section under which penalty proceedings were initiated. The decision emphasized the necessity of a clear and unambiguous notice in penalty proceedings, following a Karnataka High Court judgment supporting this view.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1200 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act for the relevant assessment year due to a defective show cause notice that lacked specificity on the limb of the section under which penalty proceedings were initiated. The decision emphasized the necessity of a clear and unambiguous notice in penalty proceedings, following a Karnataka High Court judgment supporting this view.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>