<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1187 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application and subsequently dismissed the appeal for being not maintainable before the CESTAT. The Tribunal ruled that the appeal should be directed to the Commissioner (Appeals) against the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decision, as per the Customs Act, emphasizing the High Court&#039;s directive for the appellant to approach the appropriate appellate authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1187 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application and subsequently dismissed the appeal for being not maintainable before the CESTAT. The Tribunal ruled that the appeal should be directed to the Commissioner (Appeals) against the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s decision, as per the Customs Act, emphasizing the High Court&#039;s directive for the appellant to approach the appropriate appellate authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>