<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 67 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16462</link>
    <description>Once the appellate authority cancelled the concealment penalty and the Tribunal affirmed that cancellation, the foundational finding of concealment no longer survived. Without that basis, the allegation of wilful attempt to evade tax under sections 276C and 277 of the Income-tax Act could not be sustained, and the criminal prosecution was quashed as unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:35:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 67 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16462</link>
      <description>Once the appellate authority cancelled the concealment penalty and the Tribunal affirmed that cancellation, the foundational finding of concealment no longer survived. Without that basis, the allegation of wilful attempt to evade tax under sections 276C and 277 of the Income-tax Act could not be sustained, and the criminal prosecution was quashed as unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>