<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1170 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the demand for service tax on the appellant unsustainable and set aside the impugned order-in-appeal, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal concluded that the liability for service tax on goods transport agency service charges, including ancillary services, should have been on the entity paying the freight, not on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:22:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1170 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the demand for service tax on the appellant unsustainable and set aside the impugned order-in-appeal, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal concluded that the liability for service tax on goods transport agency service charges, including ancillary services, should have been on the entity paying the freight, not on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>