https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374000 The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and penalties imposed on the appellants as the allegation of clandestine removal of excisable goods was not proven. The Tribunal found the evidence unreliable, including computer printouts and loose slips, and noted the faulty method used for calculating production based on electricity consumption. Additionally, the imposition of penalties was deemed unjustified, and the violation of principles of natural justice was acknowledged. The order was pronounced on 22/01/2019. en-us Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:21:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374000 The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and penalties imposed on the appellants as the allegation of clandestine removal of excisable goods was not proven. The Tribunal found the evidence unreliable, including computer printouts and loose slips, and noted the faulty method used for calculating production based on electricity consumption. Additionally, the imposition of penalties was deemed unjustified, and the violation of principles of natural justice was acknowledged. The order was pronounced on 22/01/2019. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374000