<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1160 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373995</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s Vardhman Strips Pvt Ltd Unit-II, holding that they correctly availed Cenvat credit. The tribunal emphasized the importance of investigating the entire supply chain before denying Cenvat credit based on invoice discrepancies. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief, and no penalties were imposable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1160 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373995</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s Vardhman Strips Pvt Ltd Unit-II, holding that they correctly availed Cenvat credit. The tribunal emphasized the importance of investigating the entire supply chain before denying Cenvat credit based on invoice discrepancies. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief, and no penalties were imposable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>