<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2748 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278298</link>
    <description>Monthly subscription collected by a co-operative housing society from its members for managing, maintaining and administering buildings was treated as taxable service activity, with the issue regarded as already covered by earlier decisions. On that basis, the dispute was resolved against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue. The stay petition and the appeal were both dismissed, and the tax demand remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:20:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2748 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278298</link>
      <description>Monthly subscription collected by a co-operative housing society from its members for managing, maintaining and administering buildings was treated as taxable service activity, with the issue regarded as already covered by earlier decisions. On that basis, the dispute was resolved against the appellant and in favour of the Revenue. The stay petition and the appeal were both dismissed, and the tax demand remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>