<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1340 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the ad-hoc disallowance of Rs. 5,00,000 related to inflated purchases and expenses while deleting the additions under sections 36(1)(iii) and 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal did not address the grounds concerning compliance with previous ITAT directions and the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The decision was rendered on March 31, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:20:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1340 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the ad-hoc disallowance of Rs. 5,00,000 related to inflated purchases and expenses while deleting the additions under sections 36(1)(iii) and 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal did not address the grounds concerning compliance with previous ITAT directions and the levy of interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The decision was rendered on March 31, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>