<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1504 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, directing the deletion of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear and specific satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings and upheld that penalties cannot be imposed based on estimations without concrete evidence. The procedural defects in the penalty orders were noted, rendering the penalties invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:20:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1504 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, directing the deletion of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear and specific satisfaction for initiating penalty proceedings and upheld that penalties cannot be imposed based on estimations without concrete evidence. The procedural defects in the penalty orders were noted, rendering the penalties invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>