https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16448 The court dismissed the petition challenging the authority's decision not to pass an order for pre-emptive purchase or clearance due to incomplete information provided by the transferee. The court emphasized that under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, pre-emptive purchase is not applicable if the land is already acquired. The authority has discretion under section 269UC(4) to rectify defects in statements. The petitioner was given six weeks to provide the necessary information for the authority to consider and make a decision in accordance with the law. en-us Mon, 07 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:05:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16448 The court dismissed the petition challenging the authority's decision not to pass an order for pre-emptive purchase or clearance due to incomplete information provided by the transferee. The court emphasized that under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, pre-emptive purchase is not applicable if the land is already acquired. The authority has discretion under section 269UC(4) to rectify defects in statements. The petitioner was given six weeks to provide the necessary information for the authority to consider and make a decision in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 07 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16448