<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 80 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16443</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the property was not held exclusively for charitable or religious purposes, as the trust deed allowed for wide discretionary use, including social and cultural purposes. Therefore, the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act was not valid. The judgment was in favor of the Revenue, and the assessee was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 80 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16443</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the property was not held exclusively for charitable or religious purposes, as the trust deed allowed for wide discretionary use, including social and cultural purposes. Therefore, the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act was not valid. The judgment was in favor of the Revenue, and the assessee was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>