https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373957 The Court directed the respondent to complete the examination of the petitioner by the next hearing date, emphasizing the need for cooperation from both parties. While the prayer to prevent further summons was not granted, the petitioner was allowed to have an authorized representative present during the examination to ensure fair treatment. The judgment sought to balance the petitioner's concerns with the respondent's investigative requirements, aiming for a thorough and fair process. en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373957 The Court directed the respondent to complete the examination of the petitioner by the next hearing date, emphasizing the need for cooperation from both parties. While the prayer to prevent further summons was not granted, the petitioner was allowed to have an authorized representative present during the examination to ensure fair treatment. The judgment sought to balance the petitioner's concerns with the respondent's investigative requirements, aiming for a thorough and fair process. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373957