<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (1) TMI 27 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to disallow the claim of Rs. 9,98,200 under &quot;Machinery and electrical repairs&quot; as the payment to Elgi Equipments Ltd. was for a new Pasteuriser plant, not repairs. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) not admitting certain documents was deemed venial. Additional evidence from the Revenue supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings, and reliance on evidence from Elgi Equipments Ltd. without cross-examination was justified. The Tribunal found no violation of natural justice, providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity. Ultimately, the Department prevailed, and the assessee&#039;s claim was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (1) TMI 27 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to disallow the claim of Rs. 9,98,200 under &quot;Machinery and electrical repairs&quot; as the payment to Elgi Equipments Ltd. was for a new Pasteuriser plant, not repairs. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) not admitting certain documents was deemed venial. Additional evidence from the Revenue supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings, and reliance on evidence from Elgi Equipments Ltd. without cross-examination was justified. The Tribunal found no violation of natural justice, providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity. Ultimately, the Department prevailed, and the assessee&#039;s claim was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>