<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1114 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373949</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the demand in the impugned order set aside, as the tax liability had already been discharged by the appellant. The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to decide on the correctness of the short payment and interest, ensuring a fair resolution of the remaining issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1114 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373949</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the demand in the impugned order set aside, as the tax liability had already been discharged by the appellant. The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to decide on the correctness of the short payment and interest, ensuring a fair resolution of the remaining issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>