<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1108 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant, who provided Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services. The appellant had paid the tax demand along with interest before the Show Cause Notice was issued, leading the Tribunal to rule that the penalties could not be sustained. The Tribunal upheld the demand and interest but set aside the penalties, partly allowing the appeal with no further changes to the Order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:36:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1108 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant, who provided Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services. The appellant had paid the tax demand along with interest before the Show Cause Notice was issued, leading the Tribunal to rule that the penalties could not be sustained. The Tribunal upheld the demand and interest but set aside the penalties, partly allowing the appeal with no further changes to the Order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>