https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373941 The appeal in Case No. ST/172/2008 was dismissed as the appellant's classification as a Clearing and Forwarding Agent was upheld. However, in Case No. ST/469/2009, the appellant was allowed to avail cenvat credit on service tax paid on Mobile Phone Charges, with the Tribunal emphasizing that as long as input services are used for providing output services, credit should be admissible. en-us Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:36:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373941 The appeal in Case No. ST/172/2008 was dismissed as the appellant's classification as a Clearing and Forwarding Agent was upheld. However, in Case No. ST/469/2009, the appellant was allowed to avail cenvat credit on service tax paid on Mobile Phone Charges, with the Tribunal emphasizing that as long as input services are used for providing output services, credit should be admissible. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373941