<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1095 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, relying on a previous judgment in the appellant&#039;s case, ruled that charges for installation, erection, commissioning, supervision, and training, being optional services not directly related to manufacturing or marketing, should not be included in the assessable value of the goods. The impugned order demanding duty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1095 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, relying on a previous judgment in the appellant&#039;s case, ruled that charges for installation, erection, commissioning, supervision, and training, being optional services not directly related to manufacturing or marketing, should not be included in the assessable value of the goods. The impugned order demanding duty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>