https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278286 The court held that the suit, involving property ownership disputes, was barred by Section 4(1) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The plaintiff's claim of being the real owner of the property purchased in his father's name was found to fall under the definition of a benami transaction, thus invoking the Act's prohibition. The suit was dismissed, with each party bearing their costs, and all pending applications were disposed of. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278286 The court held that the suit, involving property ownership disputes, was barred by Section 4(1) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The plaintiff's claim of being the real owner of the property purchased in his father's name was found to fall under the definition of a benami transaction, thus invoking the Act's prohibition. The suit was dismissed, with each party bearing their costs, and all pending applications were disposed of. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278286