<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16429</link>
    <description>The court determined that the cost of acquisition of the property should be considered the cost at which the property was acquired by purchase by the last previous owner, i.e., the assessee. This decision favored the Department and ruled against the assessee in the assessment of capital gains for the year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:54:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16429</link>
      <description>The court determined that the cost of acquisition of the property should be considered the cost at which the property was acquired by purchase by the last previous owner, i.e., the assessee. This decision favored the Department and ruled against the assessee in the assessment of capital gains for the year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>