https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278275 The case involved challenges to the first appellate order on various grounds, including unexplained purchase value of chicks, under valuation of closing stock, adhoc addition, proportionate bank interests, and u/s 68 disallowance. The appellant contested the order, arguing that the Assessing Officer failed to properly consider their explanations. The Judicial Member and the Departmental Representative found that the appellant's submissions were not adequately addressed by the CIT(A) and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing a speaking order to be passed after thorough discussion. The appeal was ultimately allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 30th June 2011. en-us Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:12:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278275 The case involved challenges to the first appellate order on various grounds, including unexplained purchase value of chicks, under valuation of closing stock, adhoc addition, proportionate bank interests, and u/s 68 disallowance. The appellant contested the order, arguing that the Assessing Officer failed to properly consider their explanations. The Judicial Member and the Departmental Representative found that the appellant's submissions were not adequately addressed by the CIT(A) and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing a speaking order to be passed after thorough discussion. The appeal was ultimately allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 30th June 2011. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278275