<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1078 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373913</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging cancellation of GST registration became infructuous after the GST portal was reopened and the petitioner&#039;s GSTIN was administratively reinstated. The Court noted that the petitioner had placed the intimation of reinstatement and the relevant returns on record, leaving no live relief for adjudication. The petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous, along with the pending application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1078 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373913</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging cancellation of GST registration became infructuous after the GST portal was reopened and the petitioner&#039;s GSTIN was administratively reinstated. The Court noted that the petitioner had placed the intimation of reinstatement and the relevant returns on record, leaving no live relief for adjudication. The petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous, along with the pending application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>