<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1050 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that Hot Rolled Coils (HR Coils) and Hot Rolled Plates (HR Plates) are not similar goods. The declared value of HR Coils was upheld as the revenue failed to prove similarity between the goods, and no valid reasons for rejection were presented. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the declared transaction value of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1050 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that Hot Rolled Coils (HR Coils) and Hot Rolled Plates (HR Plates) are not similar goods. The declared value of HR Coils was upheld as the revenue failed to prove similarity between the goods, and no valid reasons for rejection were presented. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the declared transaction value of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>