<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1047 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that HR Plates and HR Coils are not similar goods, and the Revenue failed to provide valid reasons for rejecting the declared transaction value. The declared value should be accepted unless valid reasons for rejection are provided as per the Customs Valuation Rules. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the declared transaction value was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:04:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1047 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that HR Plates and HR Coils are not similar goods, and the Revenue failed to provide valid reasons for rejecting the declared transaction value. The declared value should be accepted unless valid reasons for rejection are provided as per the Customs Valuation Rules. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the declared transaction value was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>