https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373867 The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision to reject the petitioner's Settlement Application under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the petitioner's failure to make a full and true disclosure of its duty liability. The Court emphasized that the Commission had the authority to reject the application if it was not satisfied with the disclosure or cooperation of the applicant. Previous legal precedents were cited to support the Commission's discretion in such cases. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's arguments. en-us Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373867 The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision to reject the petitioner's Settlement Application under Section 32E of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the petitioner's failure to make a full and true disclosure of its duty liability. The Court emphasized that the Commission had the authority to reject the application if it was not satisfied with the disclosure or cooperation of the applicant. Previous legal precedents were cited to support the Commission's discretion in such cases. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's arguments. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373867