https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373861 The Tribunal found that the Department failed to substantiate allegations of clandestine removal with concrete evidence. The demand for duty on the unaccounted quantity of 18,221.70 Kg of processed goods was upheld, and the case was remanded for duty quantification. The redemption fine was reduced, and the penalty on Shri. Dhiraj Sipani was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed and remanded for further quantification of duty and penalties. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:03:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373861 The Tribunal found that the Department failed to substantiate allegations of clandestine removal with concrete evidence. The demand for duty on the unaccounted quantity of 18,221.70 Kg of processed goods was upheld, and the case was remanded for duty quantification. The redemption fine was reduced, and the penalty on Shri. Dhiraj Sipani was set aside. The appeal was partly allowed and remanded for further quantification of duty and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373861