<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1397 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278267</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal of both the assessee and the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the addition to the undisclosed bank account. Issues included the non-issuance of a notice under the Income Tax Act, addition to an undisclosed bank account under section 69A, methodology for calculating the addition, and final appeal outcomes. The tribunal supported the peak credit theory and rejected the argument to tax only net profits due to insufficient evidence linking transactions to business activities. The court decision emphasized the lack of evidence, resulting in the dismissal of grounds raised by both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1397 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278267</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal of both the assessee and the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the addition to the undisclosed bank account. Issues included the non-issuance of a notice under the Income Tax Act, addition to an undisclosed bank account under section 69A, methodology for calculating the addition, and final appeal outcomes. The tribunal supported the peak credit theory and rejected the argument to tax only net profits due to insufficient evidence linking transactions to business activities. The court decision emphasized the lack of evidence, resulting in the dismissal of grounds raised by both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>