<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1637 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the entire addition made towards gross profit estimation and the adhoc disallowance of Rs. 1 crore. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO had erred in rejecting the books of account and estimating the gross profit without proper justification, and the CIT(A) had wrongly sustained the adhoc disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1637 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the entire addition made towards gross profit estimation and the adhoc disallowance of Rs. 1 crore. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO had erred in rejecting the books of account and estimating the gross profit without proper justification, and the CIT(A) had wrongly sustained the adhoc disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>