<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1022 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373857</link>
    <description>The court refrains from making a definitive ruling on whether the 1% amount collected from car purchasers under the Income Tax Act should be included in the value of goods and services for taxation purposes under Section 15 of the Goods and Services Tax Act. The court emphasizes the need for further adjudication and decides to withhold action on a specific clarification pending the disposal of the writ petition, without prejudicing the Department&#039;s rights to collect taxes in the future. This provisional decision underscores the complexity of interpreting tax laws and the court&#039;s cautious approach to resolving the issue raised by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=554093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1022 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373857</link>
      <description>The court refrains from making a definitive ruling on whether the 1% amount collected from car purchasers under the Income Tax Act should be included in the value of goods and services for taxation purposes under Section 15 of the Goods and Services Tax Act. The court emphasizes the need for further adjudication and decides to withhold action on a specific clarification pending the disposal of the writ petition, without prejudicing the Department&#039;s rights to collect taxes in the future. This provisional decision underscores the complexity of interpreting tax laws and the court&#039;s cautious approach to resolving the issue raised by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>